| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i3-9100T


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
906eb
Core
Alder Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
192.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.79k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
15.65k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
4.59k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.78k (x0.95)
TOTAL
43.33k
31.81k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
13.97k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
57.83k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
17.03k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.35k (x0.72)
TOTAL
128.45k
93.18k (x0.73)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
13.74k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
19.7k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
4.86k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
8.61k (x1.06)
TOTAL
59.33k
46.91k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
50.5k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
72.58k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
18.09k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
4.28k (x0.71)
TOTAL
194.25k
145.45k (x0.75)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
13.6k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
20.58k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.76k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
8.8k (x1.14)
TOTAL
57.97k
47.74k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
50.18k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
75.99k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
17.66k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
4.12k (x0.69)
TOTAL
201.2k
147.95k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
24.89k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
21.82k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.83k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
8.63k (x1.03)
TOTAL
58.37k
60.16k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
89.4k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
81.19k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
18.06k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.24k (x0.7)
TOTAL
225.65k
192.88k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4