Core i5-12500H vs i3-10100T
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
227.67k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
4.32k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
15.7k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
5.04k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.68k (x0.94)
TOTAL
43.33k
32.73k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
16.59k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
71.1k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
23.26k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.86k (x0.64)
TOTAL
128.45k
114.81k (x0.89)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
13.84k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
19.79k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
5.28k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
8.31k (x1.03)
TOTAL
59.33k
47.22k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
54.67k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
90.71k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
24.11k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
3.85k (x0.64)
TOTAL
194.25k
173.34k (x0.89)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
13.88k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
20.94k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
5.18k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
8.2k (x1.06)
TOTAL
57.97k
48.19k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
54.88k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
93.17k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
23.34k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
3.85k (x0.64)
TOTAL
201.2k
175.24k (x0.87)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
24.31k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.15k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
5.14k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
8.46k (x1.01)
TOTAL
58.37k
60.06k (x1.03)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
101.48k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
98.04k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
24.28k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.86k (x0.64)
TOTAL
225.65k
227.67k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4