Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a40f41
Core
Alder Lake-H
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
21.04k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.41k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
10.21k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
24.27k (x2.89)
TOTAL
58.37k
77.93k (x1.34)
Multithread
i5-12500H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
158.65k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
215.86k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
89.45k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
14.77k (x2.43)
TOTAL
225.65k
478.73k (x2.12)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4