| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.9 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2022
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
4.31k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
17.51k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
10.53k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
23.57k (x2.88)
TOTAL
43.33k
55.92k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-12500H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
24.18k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
117.98k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
70.96k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.08k (x1.33)
TOTAL
128.45k
221.19k (x1.72)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
20.37k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.52k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
10.18k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
21.49k (x2.56)
TOTAL
58.37k
74.56k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-12500H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
144.01k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
191.86k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
84.53k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.5k (x1.07)
TOTAL
225.65k
426.9k (x1.89)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4