| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.3 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2022
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
13.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.62k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.91k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
4k (x0.48)
TOTAL
58.37k
45.3k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-12500H

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
50.44k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
94k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
25.64k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.11k (x0.68)
TOTAL
225.65k
174.19k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4