Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-H
Barcelo
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
18.57k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.03k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
9.55k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
20.5k (x2.44)
TOTAL
58.37k
70.65k (x1.21)
Multithread
i5-12500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
92.92k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
128.4k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
54.82k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.13k (x0.84)
TOTAL
225.65k
281.26k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4