| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.3 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
178.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.63k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
16.69k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
4.92k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
5k (x0.61)
TOTAL
43.33k
30.24k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-12500H

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
13.62k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
65.71k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
23.7k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.64k (x0.93)
TOTAL
128.45k
108.67k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
13.51k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.34k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.98k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
4.24k (x0.5)
TOTAL
58.37k
45.07k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-12500H

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
52.21k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
95.66k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
25.54k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.85k (x0.8)
TOTAL
225.65k
178.26k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
5093 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4