Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
13.67k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.28k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.99k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
15.22k (x1.81)
TOTAL
58.37k
56.16k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-12500H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
81.03k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
145.84k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
39.14k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.79k (x1.12)
TOTAL
225.65k
272.8k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4