Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 3.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 3.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
810f10
Core
Alder Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
12/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
2.63k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
7.84k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
3.63k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
2.93k (x0.36)
TOTAL
43.33k
17.02k (x0.39)
Multithread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
5.77k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
24.15k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
9.28k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
2.83k (x0.47)
TOTAL
128.45k
42.02k (x0.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
11.67k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
14.02k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
4.53k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
2.93k (x0.36)
TOTAL
59.33k
33.14k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
20.49k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
31.32k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
9.99k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
3.03k (x0.5)
TOTAL
194.25k
64.82k (x0.33)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
11.54k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
19.69k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.55k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
3.25k (x0.42)
TOTAL
57.97k
39.03k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
19.25k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
36.27k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
10.2k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
3.07k (x0.51)
TOTAL
201.2k
68.8k (x0.34)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
10.73k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
18.15k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
3.99k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
3.89k (x0.46)
TOTAL
58.37k
36.77k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
20.11k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
36.87k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
10.74k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.31k (x0.54)
TOTAL
225.65k
71.02k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4