Core i5-12500H vs FX 9590
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 201.2 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 201.2 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
600f20
Core
Alder Lake-H
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/8
TDP
45 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2022
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
11.51k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
9.57k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.19k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
7.14k (x0.93)
TOTAL
57.97k
32.41k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-12500H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
55.13k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
51.69k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
27.02k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
3.81k (x0.63)
TOTAL
201.2k
137.65k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
1365 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2081 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
4471 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
4692 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4357 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2119 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
12883 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4