Core i5-12500H vs A12 9800
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
660f51
Core
Alder Lake-H
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
kB
Date
February 2022
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
13.42k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
17.61k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
3.77k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
3.06k (x0.36)
TOTAL
58.37k
37.86k (x0.65)
Multithread
i5-12500H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
40.46k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
43.18k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
12.78k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.37k (x0.72)
TOTAL
225.65k
100.79k (x0.45)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4