| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-1235U


Description
Both models i5-12500H and i5-1235U are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
906a4
Core
Alder Lake-H
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/16
10/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
7.33k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
18.27k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
12.8k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
13.2k (x1.62)
TOTAL
43.33k
51.61k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
29.24k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
83.32k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
54.53k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.99k (x0.82)
TOTAL
128.45k
172.07k (x1.34)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
23.53k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
23.51k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
14.71k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
13.24k (x1.63)
TOTAL
59.33k
74.99k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
106.07k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
115.88k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
60.53k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
5.88k (x0.98)
TOTAL
194.25k
288.36k (x1.48)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
23.03k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
24.11k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
13.9k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
12.11k (x1.57)
TOTAL
57.97k
73.15k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
111.78k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
124.18k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
59.87k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
5.76k (x0.96)
TOTAL
201.2k
301.58k (x1.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
36.73k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.09k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
11.24k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
11.58k (x1.38)
TOTAL
58.37k
81.64k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
130.18k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
110.21k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
50.76k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.31k (x1.04)
TOTAL
225.65k
297.46k (x1.32)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4