| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i9-9900KF


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
592.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
33.03k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
29.52k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.55k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
15.45k (x1.31)
TOTAL
76.46k
84.54k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
276.22k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
250.61k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
57.2k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
8.84k (x0.46)
TOTAL
399.39k
592.86k (x1.48)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
6241 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4