| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i9-9880H


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
381.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
27.81k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.88k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.65k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
14.19k (x1.21)
TOTAL
76.46k
73.53k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
175.69k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
166.56k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
35.04k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
4.23k (x0.22)
TOTAL
399.39k
381.53k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
8478 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4