| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i9-10900K


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.7 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
117 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
19.5k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
28.01k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
7.45k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
15.82k (x1.06)
TOTAL
77.32k
70.79k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
194.49k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
312.59k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
89.14k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
12.58k (x0.77)
TOTAL
404.19k
608.81k (x1.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
32.67k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
28.49k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.53k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
12.72k (x1.08)
TOTAL
76.46k
80.41k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
307.39k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
298.47k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
72.94k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.85k (x0.36)
TOTAL
399.39k
685.65k (x1.72)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4