| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-8700


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-8700 gets 389 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the i7-8700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
75.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
388.95k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.48k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
18.31k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.88k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
13.45k (x0.91)
TOTAL
54.04k
42.12k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
27.35k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
124.94k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
43.23k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
7.08k (x0.42)
TOTAL
271.76k
202.61k (x0.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
16.45k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
23.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
6.24k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
13.43k (x0.9)
TOTAL
77.32k
59.86k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
100.94k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
159.09k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
43.61k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
6.59k (x0.4)
TOTAL
404.19k
310.23k (x0.77)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
16.57k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.52k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
6.01k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
12.82k (x0.89)
TOTAL
77.41k
60.92k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
101.85k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
170.31k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
43.12k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
7.11k (x0.46)
TOTAL
421.18k
322.39k (x0.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
29.25k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.98k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.05k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
13.74k (x1.17)
TOTAL
76.46k
75.01k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
182.56k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
159.9k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
38.18k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
8.31k (x0.44)
TOTAL
399.39k
388.95k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2809 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
587 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5984 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6358 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2986 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16307 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4