| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-6560U


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3.7 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
406e3
Core
Alder Lake-S
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
117 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
107.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
3.29k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
13.52k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
4.24k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
7.08k (x0.48)
TOTAL
54.04k
28.14k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
6.49k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
31.11k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
10.25k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
6.16k (x0.37)
TOTAL
271.76k
54.01k (x0.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
22.21k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
19.25k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.41k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
7.09k (x0.6)
TOTAL
76.46k
52.96k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
44.94k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
44.98k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
10.83k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.26k (x0.33)
TOTAL
399.39k
107.01k (x0.27)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4