Core i5-12400F vs i7-10750H
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
349.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.69k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
18.71k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.84k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
13.95k (x0.94)
TOTAL
54.04k
43.19k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
18.79k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
86.1k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
27.42k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
5.27k (x0.32)
TOTAL
271.76k
137.58k (x0.51)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
16.63k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
24.17k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
6.38k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
13.69k (x0.92)
TOTAL
77.32k
60.87k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
67.07k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
107.95k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
27.05k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
5.07k (x0.31)
TOTAL
404.19k
207.14k (x0.51)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
16.71k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.45k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
6.06k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
13.2k (x0.91)
TOTAL
77.41k
61.43k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
67.59k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
111.94k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
27.7k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
5.3k (x0.34)
TOTAL
421.18k
212.53k (x0.5)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
29.06k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
26.49k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
6.23k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
13.89k (x1.18)
TOTAL
76.46k
75.67k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
154.61k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
151.34k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
36.33k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.93k (x0.36)
TOTAL
399.39k
349.21k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4