| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-1065G7


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
706e5
Core
Alder Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
28.19k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.13k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.32k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
14.17k (x1.2)
TOTAL
76.46k
74.82k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
86.39k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
86.22k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
32.99k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
8.75k (x0.46)
TOTAL
399.39k
214.34k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4