| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i5-5675R


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
40671
Core
Alder Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.14k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
14.35k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
4.94k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
5.47k (x0.37)
TOTAL
54.04k
28.91k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
16.02k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
54.6k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
18.69k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
16.87k (x1.01)
TOTAL
271.76k
106.18k (x0.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
12.86k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
16.85k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
5.19k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
5.49k (x0.37)
TOTAL
77.32k
40.39k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
50.07k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
64.61k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
19.84k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
17.09k (x1.05)
TOTAL
404.19k
151.6k (x0.38)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
12.88k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
18.27k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.12k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
5.45k (x0.38)
TOTAL
77.41k
41.72k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
49.91k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
70.3k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
19.69k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
16.92k (x1.1)
TOTAL
421.18k
156.83k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
21.91k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
18.59k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.2k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
5.72k (x0.49)
TOTAL
76.46k
51.43k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
84.92k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
72.09k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
20.13k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
17.07k (x0.9)
TOTAL
399.39k
194.2k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4