Core i5-12400F vs i5-10500T
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
302.13k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
3.87k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
15.79k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.1k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
12.13k (x0.82)
TOTAL
54.04k
36.89k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
22.17k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
101.79k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
34.13k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
3.74k (x0.22)
TOTAL
271.76k
161.83k (x0.6)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
13.94k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
20.01k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
5.34k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
11.41k (x0.77)
TOTAL
77.32k
50.7k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
82.18k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
124.23k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
35.6k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
3.73k (x0.23)
TOTAL
404.19k
245.75k (x0.61)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
14.01k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
21.17k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.21k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
11.42k (x0.79)
TOTAL
77.41k
51.82k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
82.38k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
115.64k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
32.22k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
3.71k (x0.24)
TOTAL
421.18k
233.94k (x0.56)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
25.16k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.28k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.18k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
11.97k (x1.02)
TOTAL
76.46k
64.6k (x0.84)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
144.86k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
120.98k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
32.55k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
3.73k (x0.2)
TOTAL
399.39k
302.13k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4