| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.3k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
16.56k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.25k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
12.61k (x0.85)
TOTAL
54.04k
38.72k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
18.1k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
79.16k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
26.75k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
13.81k (x0.83)
TOTAL
271.76k
137.82k (x0.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
26.28k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
23.38k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.52k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
12.96k (x1.1)
TOTAL
76.46k
68.14k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
163.67k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
159.74k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
39k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
7.56k (x0.4)
TOTAL
399.39k
369.97k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4