| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
15.65k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
23.13k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.66k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
11.43k (x0.79)
TOTAL
77.41k
55.87k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
26.77k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
43.81k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
10.17k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
11.91k (x0.77)
TOTAL
421.18k
92.66k (x0.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
27.14k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
24.75k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.73k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
11.84k (x1.01)
TOTAL
76.46k
69.47k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
105.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
107.47k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
24.82k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
8.02k (x0.42)
TOTAL
399.39k
246.07k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4