Core i5-12400F vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.7 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
23.11k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
20.58k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.73k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
7.43k (x0.63)
TOTAL
76.46k
55.86k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
65.84k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
60.77k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
14.45k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
4.44k (x0.23)
TOTAL
399.39k
145.51k (x0.36)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4