Core i5-12400F vs i3-10105
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.5k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
18.39k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.78k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
8.3k (x0.56)
TOTAL
54.04k
36.97k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
16.13k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
75.62k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
27.88k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
3.57k (x0.21)
TOTAL
271.76k
123.2k (x0.45)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
16.19k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
23.07k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
6.04k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
8.46k (x0.57)
TOTAL
77.32k
53.77k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
57.59k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
100.63k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
28.59k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
3.56k (x0.22)
TOTAL
404.19k
190.38k (x0.47)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
16.11k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
24.12k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.71k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
7.89k (x0.54)
TOTAL
77.41k
53.83k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
58.25k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
105.73k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
27.8k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
3.51k (x0.23)
TOTAL
421.18k
195.29k (x0.46)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
28.9k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.85k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.88k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
8.29k (x0.7)
TOTAL
76.46k
68.92k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
111.69k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
110.23k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
28.45k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
3.56k (x0.19)
TOTAL
399.39k
253.93k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4