| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.8 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806d0
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.4k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
20.25k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
11.69k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
11.66k (x0.79)
TOTAL
54.04k
48.01k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
38.93k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
191.89k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
108.8k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
14.95k (x0.89)
TOTAL
271.76k
354.57k (x1.3)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
15.22k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
25.2k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
12.66k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
11.66k (x0.78)
TOTAL
77.32k
64.74k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
155.37k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
260.27k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
115.37k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
20.04k (x1.23)
TOTAL
404.19k
551.04k (x1.36)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
17.25k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.53k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
12.56k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
11.4k (x0.79)
TOTAL
77.41k
66.74k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
144.5k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
243.41k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
109.02k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
16k (x1.04)
TOTAL
421.18k
512.94k (x1.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
30.84k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
26.38k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
12.66k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
11.74k (x1)
TOTAL
76.46k
81.62k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
294.86k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
280.92k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
113.9k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
20.16k (x1.06)
TOTAL
399.39k
709.85k (x1.78)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4