Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.8 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.8 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
38.25k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
29.92k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
15.5k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
29.89k (x2.54)
TOTAL
76.46k
113.57k (x1.49)
Multithread
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
309.6k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
260.4k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
128.56k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
20.04k (x1.05)
TOTAL
399.39k
718.59k (x1.8)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4