Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 2.7 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 2.7 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a20f12
Core
Alder Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
117 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2022
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
1060.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
19.88k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.26k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.77k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
23.59k (x2)
TOTAL
76.46k
79.51k (x1.04)
Multithread
i5-12400F
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
349.53k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
470.67k (x3.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
207.28k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
33.13k (x1.74)
TOTAL
399.39k
1060.62k (x2.66)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
10101 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4