Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a40f41
Core
Alder Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
21.04k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.41k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.21k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
24.27k (x2.06)
TOTAL
76.46k
77.93k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-12400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
158.65k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
215.86k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
89.45k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
14.77k (x0.78)
TOTAL
399.39k
478.73k (x1.2)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4