| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.31k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
17.51k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
10.53k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
23.57k (x1.59)
TOTAL
54.04k
55.92k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-12400F

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
24.18k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
117.98k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
70.96k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
8.08k (x0.48)
TOTAL
271.76k
221.19k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
20.37k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.52k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.18k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
21.49k (x1.83)
TOTAL
76.46k
74.56k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-12400F

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
144.01k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
191.86k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
84.53k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.5k (x0.34)
TOTAL
399.39k
426.9k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4