Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
497.74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.47k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
17.41k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
8.23k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
25.15k (x1.7)
TOTAL
54.04k
55.26k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
36.1k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
178.65k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
95.98k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
16.03k (x0.96)
TOTAL
271.76k
326.76k (x1.2)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
17.17k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
25.32k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
8.36k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
27.86k (x1.87)
TOTAL
77.32k
78.71k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
136.06k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
195.06k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
97.81k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
12.91k (x0.79)
TOTAL
404.19k
441.85k (x1.09)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
16.76k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
8.76k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
24.3k (x1.68)
TOTAL
77.41k
74.98k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
131.36k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
198.51k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
97.27k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
13.4k (x0.87)
TOTAL
421.18k
440.54k (x1.05)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
17.1k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
26.59k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
8.91k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
23.21k (x1.97)
TOTAL
76.46k
75.81k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
172.04k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
214.03k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
97.1k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
14.57k (x0.77)
TOTAL
399.39k
497.74k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4