Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.25k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
19.72k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.84k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
21.36k (x1.44)
TOTAL
54.04k
51.17k (x0.95)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
35.04k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
181.42k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
64.86k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
8.21k (x0.49)
TOTAL
271.76k
289.54k (x1.07)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
15.22k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
24.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
5.87k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
21k (x1.41)
TOTAL
77.32k
66.21k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
126.81k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
229.86k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
61.74k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
9.77k (x0.6)
TOTAL
404.19k
428.19k (x1.06)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
14.44k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
24.92k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.8k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
19.07k (x1.32)
TOTAL
77.41k
64.24k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
122.01k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
220.34k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
59.89k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
9.9k (x0.64)
TOTAL
421.18k
412.13k (x0.98)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
15.34k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.75k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.79k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
17.95k (x1.53)
TOTAL
76.46k
64.83k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
123.07k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
239.3k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
60.6k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
8.18k (x0.43)
TOTAL
399.39k
431.14k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4