| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
410.47k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
4.14k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
19.07k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.77k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
18.28k (x1.23)
TOTAL
54.04k
47.26k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-12400F

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
34.48k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
169.65k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
63.68k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
8.2k (x0.49)
TOTAL
271.76k
276.01k (x1.02)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
15.11k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
23.46k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.64k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
17.52k (x1.21)
TOTAL
77.41k
61.72k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-12400F

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
119.5k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
198.79k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
59.75k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
11.58k (x0.75)
TOTAL
421.18k
389.62k (x0.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
15.02k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
24.26k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.53k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
16.26k (x1.38)
TOTAL
76.46k
61.07k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-12400F

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
122.92k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
220.32k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
59.78k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
7.44k (x0.39)
TOTAL
399.39k
410.47k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4