Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
373.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
15.48k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.91k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
7.1k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
21.11k (x1.79)
TOTAL
76.46k
66.61k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
90.39k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
139.1k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
53.2k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
90.92k (x4.78)
TOTAL
399.39k
373.61k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5748 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4