Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
13.67k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
22.28k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.99k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
15.22k (x1.29)
TOTAL
76.46k
56.16k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-12400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
81.03k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
145.84k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
39.14k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.79k (x0.36)
TOTAL
399.39k
272.8k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4