Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 5.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 5.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
810f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
117 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
2.63k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
7.84k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
3.63k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
2.93k (x0.2)
TOTAL
54.04k
17.02k (x0.31)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
5.77k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
24.15k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
9.28k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
2.83k (x0.17)
TOTAL
271.76k
42.02k (x0.15)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
11.67k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
14.02k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
4.53k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
2.93k (x0.2)
TOTAL
77.32k
33.14k (x0.43)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
20.49k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
31.32k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
9.99k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
3.03k (x0.19)
TOTAL
404.19k
64.82k (x0.16)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
11.54k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
19.69k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
4.55k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
3.25k (x0.22)
TOTAL
77.41k
39.03k (x0.5)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
19.25k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
36.27k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
10.2k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
3.07k (x0.2)
TOTAL
421.18k
68.8k (x0.16)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
10.73k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
18.15k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
3.99k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
3.89k (x0.33)
TOTAL
76.46k
36.77k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
20.11k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
36.87k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
10.74k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
3.31k (x0.17)
TOTAL
399.39k
71.02k (x0.18)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4