| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
b0671
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
117 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
53.69k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
28.76k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
14.93k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
15.47k (x1.31)
TOTAL
76.46k
112.85k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
526.44k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
420.48k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
196.13k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
17.68k (x0.93)
TOTAL
399.39k
1160.72k (x2.91)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4