| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-13700HX


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2.7 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
b06f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/24
TDP
117 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
27.23k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
27.1k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
15.65k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
15.52k (x1.07)
TOTAL
77.41k
85.5k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
277.49k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
360.68k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
173.57k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
25.19k (x1.63)
TOTAL
421.18k
836.93k (x1.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
48.57k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
28.78k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
15.6k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
16.46k (x1.4)
TOTAL
76.46k
109.41k (x1.43)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
486.01k (x2.79)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
386.1k (x2.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
173.21k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
25.08k (x1.32)
TOTAL
399.39k
1070.39k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4