| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i3-13100F


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
b06f5
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
47.14k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.77k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
13.25k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
14.77k (x1.26)
TOTAL
76.46k
100.94k (x1.32)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
168.51k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
142.8k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
63.57k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
15.34k (x0.81)
TOTAL
399.39k
390.23k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4