Core i5-12400F vs i7-12800H
Description
Both models i5-12400F and i7-12800H are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
906a3
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
67.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
467.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
28.42k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
18.93k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
9.92k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
9.86k (x0.84)
TOTAL
76.46k
67.13k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
205.57k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
159.7k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
82.78k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
19.36k (x1.02)
TOTAL
399.39k
467.41k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1840 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
10387 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5921 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
3944 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2066 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2055 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
13986 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4