| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-12700H


Description
Both models i5-12400F and i7-12700H are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906a3
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
117 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
643.29k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
7.95k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
19.74k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
13.29k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
14.97k (x1.01)
TOTAL
54.04k
55.95k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
53.64k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
171.15k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
94.92k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
9.24k (x0.55)
TOTAL
271.76k
328.95k (x1.21)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
24.26k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
24.03k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
14.75k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
12.08k (x0.81)
TOTAL
77.32k
75.12k (x0.97)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
199.99k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
218.01k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
102.62k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
9.42k (x0.58)
TOTAL
404.19k
530.04k (x1.31)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
25.81k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
26.18k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
14.71k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
13.88k (x0.96)
TOTAL
77.41k
80.58k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
203.61k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
249.64k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
101.32k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
9.55k (x0.62)
TOTAL
421.18k
564.12k (x1.34)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
41.64k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.48k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
13.2k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
12.8k (x1.09)
TOTAL
76.46k
93.12k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
276.56k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
251.6k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
104.55k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
10.58k (x0.56)
TOTAL
399.39k
643.29k (x1.61)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4