Core i5-12400F vs i5-12400F
Description
Both models i5-12400F and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
90672
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
37.79k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
24.07k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
12.44k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
13.71k (x1.16)
TOTAL
76.46k
88.01k (x1.15)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
212.6k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
197.81k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
84.35k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
17.48k (x0.92)
TOTAL
399.39k
512.23k (x1.28)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4