| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i3-1215U


Description
Both models i5-12400F and i3-1215U are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.2 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906a4
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/8
TDP
117 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
10240 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
6.95k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
16.28k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
10.49k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
9.95k (x0.67)
TOTAL
54.04k
43.67k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
14.97k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
51.01k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
30.47k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
8.59k (x0.51)
TOTAL
271.76k
105.05k (x0.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
20.87k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
20.74k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
11.32k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
8.32k (x0.56)
TOTAL
77.32k
61.26k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
45.12k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
60.59k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
28.48k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
14.06k (x0.86)
TOTAL
404.19k
148.26k (x0.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
15.63k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
20.2k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
9.94k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
8.06k (x0.56)
TOTAL
77.41k
53.83k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
35.72k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
56.41k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
25k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
12.48k (x0.81)
TOTAL
421.18k
129.6k (x0.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
37.56k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
21.13k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
11.35k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
10.31k (x0.88)
TOTAL
76.46k
80.34k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
73.97k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
72.37k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
29.61k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
9.65k (x0.51)
TOTAL
399.39k
185.6k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4