| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
24.35k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
20.07k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
8.61k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
7.84k (x0.67)
TOTAL
76.46k
60.87k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
93.58k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
94.71k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
33.28k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
9.34k (x0.49)
TOTAL
399.39k
230.91k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4