| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i7-11800H


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806d1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
607.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
33.02k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
26.55k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
11.72k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
17.06k (x1.45)
TOTAL
76.46k
88.34k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
260.97k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
248.94k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
86.55k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
10.91k (x0.57)
TOTAL
399.39k
607.38k (x1.52)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
13497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4