| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i5-11400


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0671
Core
Alder Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
489.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
31.23k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
25.88k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.83k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
18.17k (x1.54)
TOTAL
76.46k
86.11k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
213.85k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
195.51k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
72.06k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
7.89k (x0.42)
TOTAL
399.39k
489.31k (x1.23)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
7528 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4