| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
117 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
238.87k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
3.75k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
17.28k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
9.5k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
8.81k (x0.59)
TOTAL
54.04k
39.34k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
12.43k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
54.95k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
26.41k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
7.38k (x0.44)
TOTAL
271.76k
101.16k (x0.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
13.43k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
22.29k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.42k
11.18k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.87k
9.75k (x0.66)
TOTAL
77.32k
56.64k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
122.98k
40.24k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
168.77k
65.99k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.11k
28.51k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.32k
6.66k (x0.41)
TOTAL
404.19k
141.4k (x0.35)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
15.12k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
23.4k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
10.9k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
9.41k (x0.65)
TOTAL
77.41k
58.83k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
45.69k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
74.42k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
29.8k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
7.16k (x0.46)
TOTAL
421.18k
157.08k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
25.96k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
23.42k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.1k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
8.71k (x0.74)
TOTAL
76.46k
68.19k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
94.88k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
99.81k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
33.6k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
10.58k (x0.56)
TOTAL
399.39k
238.87k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
3389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
3565 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
8531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6180 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5576 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
2405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
2075 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4