Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
20.99k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
11.9k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
4.72k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
3.75k (x0.27)
TOTAL
88.01k
41.36k (x0.47)
Multithread
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
172.62k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
110.03k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
44.06k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
16.93k (x0.97)
TOTAL
512.23k
343.64k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4