Core i5-12400F vs i5-5675R
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
40671
Core
Alder Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
194.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
21.91k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
18.59k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
5.2k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
5.72k (x0.42)
TOTAL
88.01k
51.43k (x0.58)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
84.92k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
72.09k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
20.13k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
17.07k (x0.98)
TOTAL
512.23k
194.2k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4