Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
38.25k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
29.92k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
15.5k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
29.89k (x2.18)
TOTAL
88.01k
113.57k (x1.29)
Multithread
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
309.6k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
260.4k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
128.56k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
20.04k (x1.15)
TOTAL
512.23k
718.59k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4